|
Post by Truttle on Feb 9, 2007 15:54:08 GMT -5
Seeing how interesting Cinderella 3 is looking, I actually would like for more sequels. Depending on how well they're done. And yeah, that's what I mean. We can make our own Unofficial Movie! I'm sure they won't notice!
|
|
|
Post by TigerTails2(TT2) on Feb 9, 2007 23:01:26 GMT -5
Hmm I have not had a chance to see BB2 yet.I guess its because I was scared it was just going to destroy the whole thing.Personally, if Disney wants to make good sequels for movies then sure.But if they suck and are just stupid AND the animation looks like its all just rushed then I'm not even going to bother watching these movies. How about Disney gets their thinking caps on and makes some new, awesome animated movies!Meh .. thats just what I think though. As for fan made sequels, thats a great idea!I saw that Balto four idea a long while ago.Sometimes I think fans have way better ideas then the companys themselves whitch is pretty funny. ;D
|
|
Bearish
Full-Fledged Individual
it's kind of about a man... and kind of about a bear. But mostly it's about a monster.
Posts: 177
|
Post by Bearish on Feb 11, 2007 4:04:54 GMT -5
I wouldnt mind to see sequels, but I mean they need to be like Aladdins sequels because at least those were done right.....as long as the sequel isn't just some random crap like "omfg love" or "secret dark twin" then I could watch it
|
|
|
Post by Night Bear on Feb 11, 2007 17:31:17 GMT -5
I'm not sure if Aladdin's sequels were "done right". I mean each sequel could have gone differently, and still be good. The problem with sequels is that the company cannot satisfy the wants of all the fans, and making the decisions are very difficult.
You can say, "Well they can ask us fans and we'll give them good ideas." But this is not such a great idea. If Disney were to accept the plot from, oh say, a couple fans, then that plot may only satisfy that group of people, or just a small portion of the fandom, and what Disney would want is a sequel that satisfies as many people as possible.
|
|
Bearish
Full-Fledged Individual
it's kind of about a man... and kind of about a bear. But mostly it's about a monster.
Posts: 177
|
Post by Bearish on Feb 13, 2007 23:41:18 GMT -5
That is impossible...you cant satisfy everyone..its just too hard, but because Aladdin was an open ended story from beginning to end in the first place, its sequels weren't like...wtf..wait...where did that guy come from? Aladdin lost his father and found him. But something like Cinderella 3? what happend to 1 with living happily ever after? Beauty and the Beast...i thought the beast became human at the end of the first one...and if im not mistaken in that point how did he become a beast again? x-x maybe i missed something in that movie..lol
|
|
|
Post by Night Bear on Feb 14, 2007 0:05:15 GMT -5
I'm not interested in Cinderella 3, but my sister so wants to see it. She might force me to watch it with her.
The Beauty and the Beast one? If that's what I think it is, I think that was supposed to take place before Beast was changed back.
|
|
|
Post by nadine on Feb 14, 2007 1:09:26 GMT -5
I think the Beauty and the Beast sequel was suppose to take place in between or somewhere in the middle of the first one cause a lot of people were wondering about that too. There's no way he can't go back to being a beast again after he's been change back into a human when Belle says that she loves him.
|
|
Bearish
Full-Fledged Individual
it's kind of about a man... and kind of about a bear. But mostly it's about a monster.
Posts: 177
|
Post by Bearish on Feb 14, 2007 1:30:53 GMT -5
see? its like what they did with lion king..lion king 2...no wait the third one that comes up is a sequal and a prequel..lion king 1 and 1/2....wtf was with that...though it did make sense..it opened up timon and pumba
|
|
|
Post by TigerTails2(TT2) on Feb 17, 2007 22:23:02 GMT -5
Disney got me so mad when it came to The Lion King! As we all know the original was amazing.The second one, I would say at least 90% of TLK fans liked the second one because it was done very well.But the Lion King 1 1/2!I agree with Bearish.Its true like wtf was with that!? Now, well maybe Disney didnt want to finish up Kovu and Kiara's story.But well I guess 1 1/2 was kind of funny ... *looks around guilty* Ok ya it was funny.But I swear if Disney makes a movie based around Rutt and Tuke, we all know for sure that Disney has finally lost all ideas for animated movies.
|
|
|
Post by Midnight on Feb 19, 2007 17:40:09 GMT -5
Well I for one quite like to see sequels. A one-off movie always leaves me wanting to see what happens later on after the events of the origional. But to be fair, it doesnt matter what Disney propose... they will have to go with what the fans want if they want the money. It's simple as that, just follow what the public wants. Governments have been doing that for years. I have my doupts on weather wikipedia is a good enough source on this kind of information. I mean... the general public can't ever give a completely reliable answer to this kind of stuff. At the end of the day... just another person sat at a desk. Just because you can edit wikipedia doesnt mean what you put on there is true. UGH!!! That would be the most vulgar thing ever!! I feel horrid just thiniking about it.
|
|
|
Post by Night Bear on Feb 19, 2007 21:22:01 GMT -5
The problem is fans want different things. And because of this, you can't satisfy everyone.
|
|
|
Post by nadine on Feb 19, 2007 21:24:58 GMT -5
The problem is fans want different things. And because of this, you can't satisfy everyone. You do have a very good point with that. If we had it our way, then the sequels would turn in every single good way as we wanted do. Not sure how it would please the others. Everyone has a different version to what the sequels might look like. That's why they create a lot of fanfictions around the internet everywhere.
|
|
|
Post by Night Bear on Feb 21, 2007 14:04:34 GMT -5
Everyone has their own ideas of what the sequel(s) should be like.
|
|